Rulings
The Firm track record
legal precedents and innovative judgments
D.A. (Derivative Action) 36670-01-22 Oren De Langa v. Yakov Atrakchi
A decision accepting a request submitted by our office to approve a derivative claim on behalf of Aura Company against the controlling shareholder of the company, Mr. Yaakov Atrakchi, on the grounds of exploiting a business opportunity of the company.
D.A. (Derivative Action) 1944-03-20 Ori Schneider v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
$48.5 Million Settlement – A judgment of the District Court (economic department) validating the settlement agreement in the derivative lawsuit filed by our law firm (and others) regarding the drugs companies cartel in the USA
D.A. (Derivative Action) 40169-01-20 Oren De Langa v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
The District Court in Jerusalem ordered Teva to disclose documents with regard to its subsidiaries’ actions in the USA
C.C 72836-05-19 (Jerusalem) S.Y.R. Liberty v. Oded Ben David
The District Court in Jerusalem accepted a lawsuit filed by our Firm regarding concealment of assets between companies
D.A. (Derivative Action) 57806-05-19 Haim Hizki v. Ytzhak Hagag and others
The District Court in Tel Aviv (Economic Department) established new guidelines regarding the doctrine of exploiting business opportunities of a public company
C.L.A [Class Action] 67187-11-18 Arie Rahav V. Nochi Dankner and Itai Strum
The district court approved a motion for approval of a class action lawsuit filed by our firm against Nochi Dankner and Itai Strum for their liability for damages to purchasers of securities of IDB Holdings Ltd. in respect of the market manipulation.
C.L.A [Class Action] 20119-08-11 Sulami-Lavie V. Delek Israel Fuel Corporation Ltd
$13.6 Million Settlement – A judgment of the District Court approving a settlement agreement in the class action filed by our firm against the Delek Company for its “Dalkan” arrangements. the court approved a cash settlement of $13.6 million (include fees and remuneration). In addition, the settlement agreement requires Delek to adopt a new pricing system for its Dalkan customers.
C.L.A [Class Action] 15731-10-11 Niram Raw Materials and Printing Equipment Ltd. et al vs. Pazomat of Paz Group Ltd. et al
$11.9 Million Settlement – A judgment of the District Court approving a settlement agreement in the class action filed by our firm against the Paz Company for their “pazomat” arrangements. the court approved a cash settlement of $11.9 million (include fees and remuneration). In addition, the settlement agreement requires Paz to adopt a new pricing system for its pazomat customers.
C.F.H (Civil Further Hearing) 2527/16, 2583/16 Jane Does vs. Adv. Uri Daniel
The President of the Supreme Court accepted our Firm’s arguments and rejected a petition for further hearing with regard to the judgment of the Supreme Court in C.A. 7426/14, 7474/14, 8119/14 in which compensations were awarded to the Firm’s client under the Defamation Law.