The Firm track record

legal precedents and innovative judgments

14.9.2014

C.C 4057-05-10, C.C 10090-10-11, C.C 1077-10-11 Jane Doe et al vs. John Doe

District Court judgment on the “rape victims plan” affair meant to harm the firm’s client – the District Court rejected false tort claims based on accusations of rape against the firm’s client, and accepted the counter claim based on a defamation cause filed by the firm’s client against those involved in filing the false complaints and claims against him.

9.9.2014

C.C 2892-12-09 Shacham Ravitzky et al vs. Daniel et al

A judgment of the Magistrate Court in Tel-Aviv that awarded compensation for damages caused by falsifying evidence against a client of the firm – the court accepted a claim of a client of the firm against a person who posed as a private investigator and “cooked up” tapes in which our firm’s client was supposedly taped, in order to file a fabricated claim against him, file a complaint to the bar association and publish a defamatory newspaper article. The court ruled that making use of the tapes while knowing that they were false constitutes a violation of the privacy protection law and defamation law, and awarded damages to the firm’s client.

8.12.2013

C.L.A [Class Action] 15731-10-11 Niram Raw Materials and Printing Equipment Ltd. et al vs. Pazomat of Paz Group Ltd. et al

A ruling of the District Court approving a class action against the Paz company for their “pazomat” arrangements – this is a motion which our firm represented, to approve a claim as a class action regarding the pricing system of diesel for Paz’s pazomat customers. The court approved the motion and approved the claim as a class action on grounds of lack of good faith in upholding a contract and depriving conditions in a standard form contract.

8.12.2013

C.L.A [Class Action] 20119-08-11 Sulami Lavie Law Firm et al vs. Delek the Israeli Fuel Company Ltd.

A ruling of the District Court approving a class action against the Delek company for their “dalkan” arrangements – this is a motion which our firm represented, to approve a claim as a class action regarding the pricing system of diesel for Delek’s Dalkan customers. The court approved the motion and approved the claim as a class action on grounds of lack of good faith in upholding a contract and depriving conditions in a standard form contract.

25.6.2013

C.C (TA) 44733-09-11 Erez Cochva Holdings (1999) Ltd. et al vs. Keyvesting Ltd. et al.

A District Court judgment regarding a violation of a company shareholder’s right of first refusal in a number of transactions in which shares and other rights to the company were purchased – the court ruled that the firm’s client’s right of first refusal was violated several times with respect of a number of transactions, and ruled that he must be allowed to exercise his right of first refusal regarding all those transactions.

17.10.2012

C.L.A [Class Action] 20119-08-11 Sulami Lavie Law firm et al vs. Delek the Israeli Fuel Company Ltd.

A ruling of the District Court regarding the transfer of a class action pursuant to section 7(a) of the class action law – the Tel-Aviv District Court approved the firm’s motion to transfer the request to approve a class action to the Central District Court in which similar class actions against other fuel companies were being held.

5.8.2012

C.C (TA) Shacham Ravitzky et al vs. Daniel et al

A verdict of the Magistrate Court in Tel-Aviv invalidating recordings and transcripts as evidence due to their forgery – the court accepted our request to extract recordings and transcripts from the court file due to their forgery by a person who posed as a private investigator.

17.6.2012

C.C (TA) 1936/06 Eliaz Zimmerman vs. Mizrahi Tefahot Bank Ltd.

District Court verdict validating a settlement agreement in a class action after it had been approved as a class action – the court validated a settlement agreement in a class action which our firm represented, after the request for its approval had been accepted, in respect of the manner of calculation of management fees for the securities deposit (overcharging the minimum quarterly fees).

27.4.2012

C.C (Center) 20528-01-12 Merhav MNF Ltd et al vs. Daniel Harpaz

A judgment of the District Court on applying the protections provided by the Defamation Law upon a claim that was filed on grounds of negligence – the District Court approved the motion to dismiss a claim in limine on behalf of the firm’s client, determining that a claim filed against a client of the firm on grounds of negligence in an expert opinion the client submitted in a lawsuit between Yossi Meiman and Nimrod Novik, should be dismissed since the protections provided by the Defamation Law apply here, even if the cause of action is negligence.